Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2002 ›
CL ›
CLARIFYING TREATMENT
Trademark search for:
CLARIFYING TREATMENT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-08-22 — Application filed
2003-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
2003-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2003-01-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-02-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-03-26 — Notice of publication
2003-04-15 — Published for opposition
2003-07-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-12-17 — Sou teas extension received
2003-12-17 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-12-17 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-06-30 — Sou teas extension received
2004-06-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-07-13 — Case file in ticrs
2004-07-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-10-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-12-16 — Sou teas extension received
2004-12-16 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-12-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2005-05-27 — Sou teas extension received
2005-05-27 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-05-27 — Sou extension 4 filed
2005-12-05 — Sou teas extension received
2005-12-05 — Sou extension 5 filed
2006-01-09 — Sou extension 5 granted
2006-06-08 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-09 — Final status recorded
2006-09-13 — Application abandoned
2006-09-13 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Colgate-Palmolive Company
New York , NY
Colgate-Palmolive Company
New York , NY
Correspondent
ANITA K YEUNG COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY 300 PARK AVE 15TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10022 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-08-22
Status Date:
2006-07-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.