Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2003 ›
HY ›
HYPER PASTE
Trademark search for:
HYPER PASTE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-09-26 — Application filed
2004-04-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
2004-05-20 — Use amendment filed
2004-05-20 — Paper received
2004-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-06-08 — Amendment to use processing complete
2004-07-02 — Paper received
2004-07-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-07-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-07-08 — Use amendment accepted
2004-07-09 — Office action issued
2004-08-04 — Examiners amendment mailed
2004-08-04 — Examiner's amendment entered
2004-08-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-08-27 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-04 — Law office publication review completed
2004-10-20 — Notice of publication
2004-11-09 — Published for opposition
2005-02-01 — Registered-principal register
2011-01-26 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-02-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-02-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2015-09-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-09-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
Susan Upton Douglass FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZA NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-09-26
Status Date:
2015-09-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.