Brandinium

Trademark search for:

KERATEC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-12-24 — Application filed
  • 2004-01-12 — Application filed
  • 2004-06-28 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2004-06-29 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2004-06-29 — Paper received
  • 2004-06-29 — Sec. 44(d) claim added
  • 2004-07-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-02-01 — Paper received
  • 2005-02-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-04-05 — Office action issued
  • 2005-04-06 — Office action issued
  • 2005-09-30 — Paper received
  • 2005-09-30 — Divisional request received
  • 2005-12-05 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2005-12-09 — Application filed
  • 2005-12-15 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2005-12-15 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2005-12-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2005-12-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2006-02-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-02-02 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2006-05-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-05-27 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
  • 2006-05-27 — Final status recorded
  • 2006-08-26 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2006-09-18 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Keratec Limited
Lincoln, Canterbury NZ

Correspondent

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC
625 SLATERS LN 4TH FL
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-12-24
Status Date:
2006-05-27
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.