Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2003 ›
LL ›
LL REGENERATION
Trademark search for:
LL REGENERATION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-12-05 — Application filed
2004-05-27 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2004-05-28 — Application filed
2004-07-16 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-20 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-03 — Paper received
2005-01-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-01-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-02-04 — Suspension letter written
2005-02-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
2005-10-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2005-10-27 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2005-10-27 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2005-11-15 — Office action issued
2005-11-17 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2005-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2005-11-23 — Final disposition recorded
2005-12-08 — Irregularity from ib examined by mpu
2006-06-21 — Application abandoned
2006-06-22 — Application abandoned
2007-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-20 — Final disposition recorded
2013-12-06 — Final status recorded
2014-06-19 — Death of international registration
2014-06-20 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Owner Information
Börlind Gesellschaft für kosmetische Erzeugnisse mbH
DE
Correspondent
KLAKA RECHTSANWäLTE DELPSTRASSE 4 D M NCHEN FED REP, 81679 GERMAN DEMOCRATIC
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-12-05
Status Date:
2013-12-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.