Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2003 ›
RO ›
ROOTS HAIRCARE
Trademark search for:
ROOTS HAIRCARE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-09-29 — Application filed
2004-04-06 — Assigned to examiner
2004-04-07 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-07 — Paper received
2004-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-11-03 — Suspension letter written
2004-11-04 — Letter of suspension mailed
2005-05-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2005-06-06 — Suspension inquiry written
2005-06-07 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2005-11-16 — Office action issued
2005-11-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-11-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-12-12 — Suspension letter written
2005-12-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
2006-06-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-01-05 — Assigned to lie
2007-01-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-01-29 — Suspension letter written
2007-01-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
2007-08-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-02-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-08-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-08-25 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-05 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-09-08 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2008-11-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-02-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-02-09 — Suspension letter written
2009-02-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-02-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-02-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-08-17 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-08-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-08-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2010-02-12 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-02-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-02-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-01 — Law office publication review completed
2010-04-06 — Published for opposition
2010-04-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-06-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-12-01 — Sou teas extension received
2010-12-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-12-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-06-01 — Sou teas extension received
2011-06-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-06-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-06-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-06-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-08-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-11-29 — Sou teas extension received
2011-11-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-12-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-12-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-05-16 — Sou teas extension received
2012-05-16 — Sou extension 4 filed
2012-05-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
2012-05-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-11-15 — Sou teas extension received
2012-11-15 — Sou extension 5 filed
2012-11-19 — Sou extension 5 granted
2012-11-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-01 — Application abandoned
2013-07-01 — Application abandoned
2013-07-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Roots Canada Ltd.
Toronto CA
Roots Canada Ltd.
Toronto CA
Correspondent
Beth M. Goldman ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100 IRVINE, CA 92614-8255 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-09-29
Status Date:
2013-07-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.