Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LIGHT WAND

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-10-04 — Application filed
  • 2004-10-18 — Application filed
  • 2004-11-18 — Paper received
  • 2004-11-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-12-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-05-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-05-05 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-05-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-05-06 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 2005-05-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-05-11 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-08-17 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-09-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2005-11-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-05-26 — Paper received
  • 2006-05-26 — Use amendment filed
  • 2006-05-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-06-16 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-06-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-06-21 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2006-06-30 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2006-07-14 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-08-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-08-03 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2006-09-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-02-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-02-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-03-14 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2012-04-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2012-04-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2012-04-07 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - mailed
  • 2013-11-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-11-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-07-22 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2015-09-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2015-12-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-12-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-12-06 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2017-02-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-02-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2017-02-08 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2017-02-08 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2017-08-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-08-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-08-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-05-11 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2020-11-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-11-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-11-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-11-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-11-18 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2020-11-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-11-19 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2020-11-19 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2021-02-24 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2021-06-08 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
  • 2021-06-09 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2021-06-09 — Cancelled section 18-total
  • 2021-06-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BEAUTY VISIONS, LLC
NEW YORK , NY
MALLYGIRL LLC
Towson , MD
MALLYGIRL LLC
Towson , MD
MALLYGIRL LLC
New York , NY

Correspondent

MELANIE HOWARD LOEB & LOEB LLP
10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD
SUITE 2200
LOS ANGELES, CA 10022

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-10-04
Status Date:
2021-06-09
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.