Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2005 ›
DI ›
DIOR ADDICT 2
Trademark search for:
DIOR ADDICT 2
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-21 — Application filed
2005-03-28 — Application filed
2005-05-09 — Paper received
2005-05-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-05-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-05-25 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-12 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-13 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-15 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-14 — Paper received
2006-02-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-03-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-04-14 — Assigned to lie
2006-05-03 — Law office publication review completed
2006-06-07 — Notice of publication
2006-06-27 — Published for opposition
2006-09-19 — Registered-principal register
2012-08-30 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2012-09-21 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-09-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-09-21 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - mailed
2017-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-04-05 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
2017-04-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-04-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR
75008 Paris FR
PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR
75008 Paris FR
PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR
75008 Paris FR
Correspondent
David Ehrlich FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-21
Status Date:
2017-04-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.