Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2005 ›
LA ›
LANEIGE GIRL
Trademark search for:
LANEIGE GIRL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-04-14 — Application filed
2005-04-25 — Application filed
2005-11-13 — Assigned to examiner
2005-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2005-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-08 — Paper received
2006-05-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-05-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-06-14 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-06-14 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-06-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-06-14 — Examiners amendment mailed
2006-06-16 — Assigned to lie
2006-06-20 — Law office publication review completed
2006-07-19 — Notice of publication
2006-08-08 — Published for opposition
2006-10-31 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-04-30 — Teas statement of use received
2007-04-30 — Use amendment filed
2007-08-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2007-08-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2007-09-19 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-20 — Law office registration review completed
2007-10-23 — Registered-principal register
2014-05-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-05-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul 140-777 KR
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul 140-777 KR
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul 140-777 KR
Correspondent
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP 292 MADISON AVE FL 19 NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-04-14
Status Date:
2014-05-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.