Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2005 ›
SC ›
SCENTTRACTION
Trademark search for:
SCENTTRACTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-11-15 — Application filed
2005-11-18 — Application filed
2006-05-20 — Assigned to examiner
2006-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-08 — Office action issued
2006-06-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-06-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-07-17 — Office action issued
2006-07-17 — Office action issued
2006-10-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-11-02 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-04 — Law office publication review completed
2006-12-06 — Notice of publication
2006-12-26 — Published for opposition
2007-03-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-09-11 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-09-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-03-13 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-04-01 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-07-10 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-09-22 — Sou teas extension received
2008-09-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-04-20 — Application abandoned
2009-04-20 — Application abandoned
2009-04-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Symrise GmbH & Co. KG
Holzminden DE
Symrise GmbH & Co. KG
Holzminden DE
Correspondent
Stanley C. Macel, III, Esq. CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP PO BOX 2207 WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-11-15
Status Date:
2009-04-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.