Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LANCASTER TAN MAXIMIZER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2006-01-03 — Application filed
  • 2006-03-16 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2006-03-17 — Application filed
  • 2006-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-05-06 — Office action issued
  • 2006-05-08 — Office action issued
  • 2006-05-08 — Office action issued
  • 2006-05-25 — Office action issued
  • 2006-11-08 — Office action issued
  • 2006-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-11-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-12-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-03-29 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2007-06-12 — Office action issued
  • 2007-06-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-06-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-08-16 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2007-08-16 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2007-08-31 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2007-10-08 — Office action issued
  • 2007-10-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-10-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-10-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-12-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-12-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-12-19 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-01-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-03-25 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-07-10 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2010-07-15 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2013-05-06 — Teas section 71 received
  • 2013-05-28 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-06-04 — Post registration action mailed - sec.71
  • 2013-07-02 — Fax received
  • 2013-07-10 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
  • 2013-07-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - mailed
  • 2014-03-10 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2014-07-09 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2015-03-20 — Partial invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2015-03-27 — New representative at ib received
  • 2016-02-04 — International registration renewed
  • 2016-09-08 — New representative at ib received
  • 2017-04-21 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2018-10-26 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2018-10-26 — Final status recorded
  • 2019-06-26 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2019-07-04 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2019-07-11 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2019-07-11 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2019-11-04 — Invalidation processed
  • 2019-11-05 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2019-12-13 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2023-09-30 — New representative at ib received
  • 2025-11-14 — New representative at ib received

Owner Information

Coty Beauty Germany GmbH
DE
Coty Germany GmbH
DE
Coty GmbH
DE
COTY PRESTIGE LANCASTER GROUP GmbH
55116 MAINZ DE
COTY PRESTIGE LANCASTER GROUP GmbH
55116 MAINZ DE
COTY PRESTIGE LANCASTER GROUP GmbH
55116 MAINZ DE
LANCASTER GROUP GmbH
55116 MAINZ DE

Correspondent

Joseph Conklin Coty Inc.
2 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-01-03
Status Date:
2018-10-26
Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.