Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2006 ›
TI ›
TIME RESPONSE INTENSIVE HAND RENEWAL CREME
Trademark search for:
TIME RESPONSE INTENSIVE HAND RENEWAL CREME
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-04-04 — Application filed
2006-04-07 — Application filed
2006-07-12 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-07-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-07-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-07-18 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2006-07-28 — Assigned to lie
2006-08-03 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-30 — Notice of publication
2006-09-19 — Published for opposition
2006-12-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-06-11 — Teas statement of use received
2007-06-11 — Use amendment filed
2007-08-07 — Statement of use processing complete
2007-09-06 — Final disposition recorded
2007-09-06 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-20 — Office action issued
2008-01-03 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2008-01-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-01-03 — Assigned to lie
2008-01-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-01-04 — Law office registration review completed
2008-02-12 — Registered-principal register
2014-09-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-09-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul KR
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul KR
Amorepacific Corporation
Seoul KR
Correspondent
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP 292 MADISON AVE FL 19 NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-04-04
Status Date:
2014-09-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.