Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2007 ›
03 ›
3-IN-ONE RUSTBLOCKER
Trademark search for:
3-IN-ONE RUSTBLOCKER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-12-28 — Application filed
2008-01-03 — Application filed
2008-01-04 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-03-28 — Assigned to examiner
2008-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-30 — Office action issued
2008-09-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-10 — Suspension letter written
2008-10-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-10-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-04-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-04-10 — Assigned to lie
2009-10-12 — Assigned to lie
2009-10-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-04-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-04-16 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-11-16 — Assigned to lie
2010-11-16 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
2010-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
2010-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
2011-07-25 — Application abandoned
2011-07-25 — Application abandoned
2011-07-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
WD-40 Company
San Diego , CA
Correspondent
KATHLEEN A. PASULKA Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP 525 B Street, Suite 2200 San Diego, CA 92101 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-12-28
Status Date:
2011-07-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.