Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2007 ›
TO ›
TOOTH CONDITIONER
Trademark search for:
TOOTH CONDITIONER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-10-15 — Application filed
2007-10-19 — Application filed
2008-01-23 — Assigned to examiner
2008-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-07-23 — Teas amendment of use received
2008-07-24 — Amendment to use processing complete
2008-07-24 — Use amendment filed
2008-07-24 — Assigned to lie
2008-07-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-07-31 — Office action issued
2008-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-08-02 — Application abandoned
2008-08-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-08-13 — Office action issued
2008-08-13 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-08-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-08-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-08-13 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-08-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-04 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-10 — Application abandoned
2009-04-10 — Final status recorded
2009-04-13 — Application abandoned
2012-03-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Channel Distribution
Lake Forest , CA
Correspondent
Jeromye V. Sartain Mind Law Firm, P.C. 36 Executive Park, Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92614 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-10-15
Status Date:
2009-04-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.