Trademark search for:

ESTHER 2:12

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2008-07-23 — Application filed
2008-07-28 — Application filed
2008-07-29 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-10-31 — Assigned to examiner
2008-11-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-11-07 — Assigned to lie
2008-11-07 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-26 — Notice of publication
2008-11-26 — Assigned to examiner
2008-12-16 — Published for opposition
2009-03-03 — Registered-principal register
2015-01-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-01-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-01-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-01-30 — Teas section 8 received
2015-02-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2015-02-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2015-02-05 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2017-07-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-07-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-03-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2019-04-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-04-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-10-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2019-10-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Esther 2:12
Seattle , WA

Esther 2:12
Seattle , WA

Esther 2:12
Seattle , WA

Correspondent

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.
446 E Southern Ave
Tempe, AZ 85282
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-07-23

Status Date:
2019-10-04

Category:
Cosmetics & Cleaning

Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.