Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2009 ›
PO ›
POWERPRIMER
Trademark search for:
POWERPRIMER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-04-01 — Application filed
2009-04-04 — Application filed
2009-04-06 — Application filed
2009-04-07 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-29 — Assigned to examiner
2009-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-24 — Office action issued
2009-12-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-12-10 — Assigned to lie
2009-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-10 — Law office publication review completed
2010-01-12 — Published for opposition
2010-01-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-04-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-08-19 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2010-08-19 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2010-08-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-08-20 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2010-09-28 — Registered-principal register
2016-05-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-05-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-05-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-05-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
Paris FR
Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
Paris FR
Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
Paris FR
Correspondent
Natalie G. Furman Paul Hastings LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-04-01
Status Date:
2017-05-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.