Brandinium

Trademark search for:

REVEAL BY HARMONY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-10-12 — Application filed
  • 2009-10-15 — Application filed
  • 2009-10-16 — Application filed
  • 2009-10-17 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2010-01-13 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-02-04 — Office action issued
  • 2010-02-04 — Office action issued
  • 2010-02-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-02-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-03-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-04-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-04-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-06-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-11-30 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-11-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-12-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-06-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-06-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-06-07 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-06-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-06-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-12-15 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-12-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-12-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-12-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-05-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-05-18 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-05-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-05-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-06-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-06-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-10-26 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-10-26 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-10-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-11-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-12-04 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-12-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-12-17 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-12-18 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2013-01-22 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-11-14 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2013-11-14 — Sec 7 request filed
  • 2013-11-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-11-27 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-11-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-11-27 — Correction under section 7 - processed
  • 2016-02-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-02-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-01-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-08-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-08-23 — Final status recorded
  • 2020-12-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-12-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-12-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-12-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-12-03 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains

Owner Information

NAIL ALLIANCE, LLC
GLADSTONE , MO
NAIL ALLIANCE, LLC
GLADSTONE , MO
Danny Haile
La Mirade , CA
Danny Haile
La Mirade , CA

Correspondent

Laila Wolfgram Polsinelli PC
100 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1000
St. Louis, MO 63110
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-10-12
Status Date:
2019-08-23
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.