Trademark search for:

RICH CLEAN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2010-12-17 — Application filed
2010-12-21 — Application filed
2010-12-23 — Application filed
2011-03-18 — Assigned to examiner
2011-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-08-26 — Office action issued
2011-08-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-09-21 — Assigned to lie
2011-09-21 — Law office publication review completed
2011-10-25 — Published for opposition
2011-10-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-12-20 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-06-20 — Sou teas extension received
2012-06-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-07-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-07-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-07-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-10-19 — Sou teas extension received
2012-10-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-10-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-10-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-22 — Application abandoned
2013-07-22 — Application abandoned
2013-07-22 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

The Procter & Gamble Company
Cincinnati , OH

The Procter & Gamble Company
Cincinnati , OH

Correspondent

STEVEN W. CALDWELL THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
299 E 6TH ST # 8
CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3216
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-12-17

Status Date:
2013-07-22

Category:
Cosmetics & Cleaning

Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.