Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2012 ›
EP ›
EPIDERMAL INFUSION
Trademark search for:
EPIDERMAL INFUSION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-07-03 — Application filed
2012-07-06 — Application filed
2012-07-11 — Application filed
2012-08-23 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2013-01-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-01-30 — Office action issued
2013-01-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-01-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-02-12 — Assigned to lie
2013-02-13 — Law office publication review completed
2013-02-22 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2013-03-04 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2013-10-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-10-04 — Office action issued
2013-10-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2013-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2013-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-05-05 — Office action issued
2014-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-05-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-06-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-06-02 — Assigned to lie
2014-06-05 — Law office publication review completed
2014-06-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-07-08 — Published for opposition
2014-07-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-09-02 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-09-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-11-21 — Teas change of owner address received
2014-11-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2015-03-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2015-03-09 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2015-03-09 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2015-03-09 — Petition to revive-granted
2015-03-09 — Teas petition to revive received
2015-04-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-04-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
2015-04-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-09-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
2015-09-18 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2015-09-18 — Petition to revive-granted
2015-09-18 — Teas petition to revive received
2015-09-19 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2015-09-21 — Notice of revival - mailed
2015-09-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2015-10-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-02-26 — Sou teas extension received
2016-02-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
2016-03-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
2016-03-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-05-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-05-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-08-16 — Sou teas extension received
2016-08-16 — Sou extension 4 filed
2016-08-29 — Sou extension 4 granted
2016-08-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-03-01 — Sou teas extension received
2017-03-01 — Sou extension 5 filed
2017-03-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-03-03 — Sou extension 5 granted
2017-03-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-10-09 — Application abandoned
2017-10-09 — Final status recorded
2017-10-10 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Envy Medical, Inc.
Westlake Village , DE
Envy Medical, Inc.
Westlake Village , CA
Correspondent
Patchen M. Haggerty Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-07-03
Status Date:
2017-10-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.