Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2014 ›
BE ›
BEAUTIFOL
Trademark search for:
BEAUTIFOL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-12-10 — Application filed
2014-12-13 — Application filed
2014-12-15 — Application filed
2014-12-16 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2015-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2015-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-26 — Removed from teas plus
2015-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-24 — Application abandoned
2015-10-26 — Application abandoned
2015-12-02 — Office action issued
2015-12-02 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2015-12-02 — Petition to revive-granted
2015-12-02 — Teas petition to revive received
2015-12-15 — Assigned to lie
2015-12-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-12-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-01-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-01-08 — Law office publication review completed
2016-01-27 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-02-16 — Published for opposition
2016-02-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-05-03 — Registered-principal register
2021-05-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2022-11-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-11-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Jmcosmetics Limited Guangzhou
Guangzhou CN
Jmcosmetics Limited Guangzhou
Guangzhou CN
Jmcosmetics Limited Guangzhou
Guangzhou CN
Correspondent
APPERT, RICHARD LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. 101 N BRAND BLVD STE 1100 GLENDALE, CA 91203-2638 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-12-10
Status Date:
2022-11-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.