Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SOUND DOCTRINE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1993-03-18 — Application filed
  • 1993-06-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1993-06-16 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1993-06-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1993-07-23 — Notice of publication
  • 1993-08-24 — Published for opposition
  • 1993-11-16 — Registered-principal register
  • 1999-11-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
  • 2000-11-13 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
  • 2000-12-13 — Response received to post reg. action - sec. 8
  • 2000-12-29 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2004-03-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2004-03-17 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2004-03-17 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2004-04-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2004-04-30 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2007-09-07 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2008-06-02 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2009-02-21 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2009-02-21 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2009-02-21 — Cancellation denied no. 999999
  • 2016-01-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
  • 2016-01-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SOUND DOCTRINE
OXFORD , MI
SOUND DOCTRINE
Center Line , MI
SOUND DOCTRINE
Center Line , MI

Correspondent

Sound Doctrine
2955 Stonehenge
Oxford, MI 48371
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-03-18
Status Date:
2016-01-26
Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.