Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
1996 ›
VE ›
VESPACAFE
Trademark search for:
VESPACAFE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-05-11 — Application filed
2012-05-15 — Application filed
2012-05-17 — Application filed
2012-05-18 — Notice of design search code mailed
2012-08-31 — Assigned to examiner
2012-09-04 — Priority action written
2012-09-04 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2012-09-04 — Priority action e-mailed
2013-02-27 — Office action issued
2013-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-03-13 — Assigned to lie
2013-03-18 — Law office publication review completed
2013-04-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-04-23 — Published for opposition
2013-04-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-06-18 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-11-18 — Sou teas extension received
2013-11-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-11-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-11-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-05-29 — Sou teas extension received
2014-05-29 — Sou extension 2 filed
2014-06-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-06-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2014-06-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-11-16 — Sou teas extension received
2014-11-16 — Sou extension 3 filed
2014-11-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2014-11-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-05-13 — Sou teas extension received
2015-05-13 — Sou extension 4 filed
2015-05-26 — Sou extension 4 granted
2015-05-27 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
2015-11-20 — Sou extension 5 filed
2015-12-02 — Sou extension 5 granted
2015-12-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-06-13 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2016-06-13 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2016-06-28 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2016-07-01 — On hold - electronic record review required
2016-09-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2016-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2016-10-07 — Electronic record review complete
2017-03-03 — Office action issued
2017-03-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-03-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-03-04 — Suspension letter written
2017-03-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-03-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-09-19 — Assigned to lie
2017-09-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-09-27 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-09-27 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-09-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-02-06 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2018-02-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-02-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-03-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-03-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-04-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-04-10 — Published for opposition
2018-06-26 — Registered-principal register
2023-06-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-01-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-01-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Piaggio & C. S.p.A.
Pontedera (PI) IT
Piaggio & C. S.p.A.
Pontedera (PI) IT
Piaggio & C. S.p.A.
Pontedera (PI) IT
Correspondent
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC 400 7TH ST NW STE 600 WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-05-11
Status Date:
2025-01-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.