Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ADVENTURE TELEVISION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-08-06 — Application filed
  • 2002-10-01 — Paper received
  • 2002-12-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-02-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-06-19 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-07-31 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-08-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-03-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-09-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-04-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-07-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-01-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-01-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-01-30 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-10-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2008-03-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-07-11 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2008-07-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2008-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-03-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-09-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-30 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-09-30 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-30 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-30 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-10-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-10-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-11-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-11-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-02-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-05-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-08-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-08-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-08-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-08-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-02-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-02-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-02-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-02-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-02-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-08-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-08-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-08-09 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-08-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-02-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-02-02 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-02-15 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-02-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-08-01 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-08-01 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2012-08-16 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2012-08-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-03-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-03-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-03-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

VERSUS, L.P.
Philadelphia , PA
VERSUS, L.P.
Philadelphia , PA
Outdoor Life Network, L.L.C.
Stamford , CT

Correspondent

David M. Silverman, Esq. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006-3401

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-08-06
Status Date:
2013-03-04
Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.