Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2003 ›
FI ›
FIDELITY BESTPRACTICES
Trademark search for:
FIDELITY BESTPRACTICES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-02-20 — Application filed
2003-08-11 — Assigned to examiner
2003-08-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2003-08-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-09-24 — Notice of publication
2003-10-14 — Published for opposition
2004-01-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-07-06 — Sou teas extension received
2004-07-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-07-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-01-06 — Sou teas extension received
2005-01-06 — Teas statement of use received
2005-01-06 — Use amendment filed
2005-01-06 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-01-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2005-01-18 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-01-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-01-21 — Assigned to lie
2005-02-01 — Law office registration review completed
2005-06-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-07-19 — Registered-principal register
2007-11-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2008-06-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-06-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-02-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2012-02-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
FMR LLC
BOSTON , MA
FMR Corp.
Boston , MA
FMR Corp.
Boston , MA
FMR Corp.
Boston , MA
Correspondent
Thomas Barry FMR LLC 82 Devonshire Street F7D Boston, MA 02109
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-02-20
Status Date:
2012-02-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.