Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2004 ›
NA ›
NANOMETHOD
Trademark search for:
NANOMETHOD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-01-27 — Application filed
2004-02-09 — Application filed
2004-08-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-08-18 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-31 — Assigned to lie
2004-08-31 — Law office publication review completed
2004-10-25 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2005-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2005-03-31 — Office action issued
2005-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-04-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-05-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-05-20 — Assigned to lie
2005-05-20 — Law office publication review completed
2005-08-24 — Notice of publication
2005-09-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-09-13 — Published for opposition
2005-12-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-05-31 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-05-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-12-06 — Sou teas extension received
2006-12-06 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-12-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-06-07 — Final status recorded
2007-12-06 — Application abandoned
2007-12-12 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Sugi, Shinji
Kobe-shi, Hyogo JP
Sugi, Shinji
Kobe-shi, Hyogo JP
Correspondent
RANDOLPH A SMITH SMITH PATENT OFFICE 1901 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 901 WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3433 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-01-27
Status Date:
2007-06-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.