Brandinium

Trademark search for:

AMIGO KIT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-06-09 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-14 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-22 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2005-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-02-07 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-04-11 — Paper received
  • 2006-04-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-05-09 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-07-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-07-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-01-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-01-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-09-12 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-03-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-04-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-10-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-11-17 — Paper received
  • 2008-11-18 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-11-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-12-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-12-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-12-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-12-10 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-12-11 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2008-12-19 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-02-13 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-03-09 — Office action issued
  • 2009-03-10 — Office action issued
  • 2009-04-15 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-04-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-04-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-04-16 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2009-04-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-04-29 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-05-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-08-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-01-27 — Teas petition to amend basis received
  • 2010-02-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-02-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-02-12 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2010-02-16 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
  • 2010-02-16 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
  • 2010-08-11 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2010-08-16 — Paper received
  • 2010-08-16 — Divisional request received
  • 2010-09-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-09-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-09-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-10-01 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2010-10-01 — Case returned to examination
  • 2010-10-02 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2010-10-22 — On hold - electronic record review required
  • 2011-08-15 — Paper received
  • 2011-08-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-09-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-09-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-09-22 — Electronic record review complete
  • 2011-10-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-12-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2018-07-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-07-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Administradora de Marcas RD, S. de R.L. de C.V.
C.P. 11320, Mexico, D.F. MX
Administradora de Marcas RD, S. de R.L. de C.V.
C.P. 11320, Mexico, D.F. MX
Administradora de Marcas RD, S. de R.L. de C.V.
C.P. 11320, Mexico, D.F. MX

Correspondent

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB
666 3RD AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10017-5621
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-06-09
Status Date:
2018-07-27
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.