Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CLUB PENGUIN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-09-05 — Application filed
  • 2005-09-12 — Application filed
  • 2006-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-03-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-03-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-04-10 — Office action issued
  • 2006-04-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-04-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-04-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-05-21 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-05-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-11-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-12-09 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-12-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-06-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-06-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-08 — Office action issued
  • 2007-06-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-06-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-08-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-08-20 — Office action issued
  • 2007-08-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-08-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-08-22 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2007-10-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-10-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-10-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-04-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-05-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-05-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-28 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-07-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-11-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-11-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-21 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-01-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-01-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-04-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-07-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-07-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-08-01 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-08-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-08-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-02-10 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-02-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-25 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-03-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-03-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-03-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-03-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-09-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-11-08 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-11-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-11-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-04-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-04-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-04-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-05-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-05-05 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-05-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-05-05 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-11-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-11-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-11-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-11-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-05-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-05-22 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-05-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-05-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-11-20 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-11-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-11-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-12-29 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-12-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-12-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-02-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-07-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-07-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-07-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-07-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-12-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-12-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-12-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-12-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-02-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-02-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-02-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-08-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-08-21 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-08-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-08-21 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-12-30 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-12-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-12-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-02-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-02-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-02-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-08-03 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-08-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-08-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-01-19 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-01-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-01-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-02-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-02-22 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-03-09 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-03-29 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-03-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2016-05-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2016-10-31 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2016-10-31 — Use amendment filed
  • 2016-11-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-11-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2016-12-01 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2016-12-02 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2017-01-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2021-05-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-05-07 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2021-05-07 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-05-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-05-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-05-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-05-07 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2022-01-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-07-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-07-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DISNEY CANADA INC.
KELOWNA CA
DISNEY CANADA INC.
KELOWNA CA
DISNEY CANADA INC.
KELOWNA CA
DISNEY ONLINE STUDIOS CANADA INC.
VANCOUVER CA
NEW HORIZON INTERACTIVE LTD.
KELOWNA CA
New Horizon Productions Ltd.
Kelowna CA

Correspondent

Kaydi Osowski The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
IP Department - Trademark Group
Burbank, CA 91521

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-09-05
Status Date:
2023-07-14
Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.