Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2006 ›
DR ›
DR. WOOD
Trademark search for:
DR. WOOD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-12-15 — Application filed
2006-12-20 — Application filed
2007-04-06 — Assigned to examiner
2007-04-17 — Priority action written
2007-04-17 — Priority action e-mailed
2007-10-16 — Office action issued
2007-11-14 — Assigned to lie
2007-11-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-11-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-05 — Office action issued
2008-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-02-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-02-26 — Restore to teas plus
2008-02-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-02-26 — Removed from teas plus
2008-02-26 — Law office publication review completed
2008-03-12 — Notice of publication
2008-04-01 — Published for opposition
2008-06-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-12-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-12-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-12-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-06-24 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-24 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-07-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-07-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-01-25 — Application abandoned
2010-01-25 — Application abandoned
2010-01-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CHRISTOPHER DOW
ENCINO , CA
CHRISTOPHER DOW
ENCINO , CA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-12-15
Status Date:
2010-01-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.