Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2006 ›
RA ›
@RADICAL/CONTENT
Trademark search for:
@RADICAL/CONTENT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-01-12 — Application filed
2006-01-18 — Application filed
2006-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-22 — Assigned to examiner
2006-05-24 — Paper received
2006-05-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-06-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-06-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-06-15 — Assigned to lie
2006-06-28 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-02 — Notice of publication
2006-08-22 — Published for opposition
2006-11-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-04-18 — Sou teas extension received
2007-04-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-04-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-11-14 — Sou teas extension received
2007-11-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-11-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-04-17 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-09-24 — Sou teas extension received
2008-09-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-09-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-06-15 — Application abandoned
2009-06-15 — Application abandoned
2009-06-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
@radical.media,inc.
New York , NY
@radical.media,inc.
New York , NY
Correspondent
Edward H. Rosenthal FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ, PC 488 MADISON AVE FL 9 NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-01-12
Status Date:
2009-06-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.