Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2007 ›
PO ›
POSITIVELY TRAINING!
Trademark search for:
POSITIVELY TRAINING!
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-04-11 — Application filed
2007-04-16 — Application filed
2007-06-12 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-06-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-07-25 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-07-25 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-07-25 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-07-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-07-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-07-27 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-27 — Law office publication review completed
2007-08-15 — Notice of publication
2007-09-04 — Published for opposition
2007-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-05-27 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2008-08-11 — Application abandoned
2008-08-11 — Application abandoned
2008-09-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-09-07 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-09-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-09 — New noa to issue
2008-10-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-05-25 — Application abandoned
2009-05-25 — Final status recorded
2009-05-26 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Positively Training!, Inc.
Grand Terrace , CA
Positively Training!, Inc.
Grand Terrace , CA
Correspondent
PAMELA STEWART POSITIVELY TRAINING!, INC. PO Box 3071 Wrightwood, CA 92397 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-04-11
Status Date:
2009-05-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.