Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2007 ›
SU ›
SUBLUX
Trademark search for:
SUBLUX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-05-04 — Application filed
2009-05-07 — Application filed
2009-05-07 — Application filed
2009-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
2009-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-01-30 — Office action issued
2010-01-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-02-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-02-25 — Assigned to lie
2010-02-25 — Law office publication review completed
2010-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-03-30 — Published for opposition
2010-03-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-05-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-11-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-11-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-11-24 — Sou teas extension received
2010-11-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-12-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-12-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-06-27 — Application abandoned
2011-06-27 — Application abandoned
2011-06-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sublux, Inc.
Chicago , IL
Sublux, Inc.
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
Colin T.J. O'Brien Partridge IP Law 161 North Clark Street Suite 4700 Chicago, IL 60601
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-05-04
Status Date:
2011-06-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.