Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2011 ›
MA ›
MATAME SUAVEMENTE
Trademark search for:
MATAME SUAVEMENTE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-04-21 — Application filed
2011-04-25 — Application filed
2011-04-26 — Application filed
2011-07-28 — Assigned to examiner
2011-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2012-02-03 — Office action issued
2012-02-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-02-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-02-07 — Office action issued
2012-02-07 — Office action issued
2012-02-07 — Office action issued
2012-08-07 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-08-07 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2012-08-07 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2012-08-07 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2012-08-13 — Assigned to lie
2012-08-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-08-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-08-30 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-30 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2012-08-30 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2012-11-13 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2013-01-18 — Application abandoned
2013-01-18 — Exparte appeal terminated
2013-01-18 — Final status recorded
2013-01-22 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Meta, Natalia Olga
Buenos Aires AR
Correspondent
PERLA M KUHN EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP PO BOX 130 NEW YORK, NY 10150-0130 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-04-21
Status Date:
2013-01-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.