Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2014 ›
DA ›
DAILY JOINT
Trademark search for:
DAILY JOINT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-02-08 — Application filed
2014-02-12 — Application filed
2014-02-21 — Application filed
2014-05-15 — Assigned to examiner
2014-05-16 — Assigned to examiner
2014-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-11-23 — Office action issued
2014-11-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-11-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-12 — Office action issued
2015-06-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-11 — Office action issued
2016-01-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-01-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-04 — Office action issued
2016-02-04 — Office action issued
2016-02-04 — Office action issued
2016-08-04 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-08-05 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2016-08-05 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2016-08-05 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2016-08-13 — Assigned to lie
2016-08-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-08-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-09-08 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-09-08 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-09-08 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-09-08 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-09-15 — Exparte appeal terminated
2016-09-26 — Assigned to lie
2016-10-04 — Law office publication review completed
2016-10-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-11-08 — Published for opposition
2016-11-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-01-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-07-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2017-08-07 — Application abandoned
2017-08-07 — Application abandoned
2017-10-05 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2017-10-05 — Petition to revive-granted
2017-10-05 — Teas petition to revive received
2017-10-06 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2017-10-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-10-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2017-10-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-01-03 — Sou teas extension received
2018-01-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2018-01-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-01-05 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-06-20 — Sou teas extension received
2018-06-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
2018-06-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2018-06-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-01-02 — Sou teas extension received
2019-01-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
2019-01-02 — Sou extension 4 filed
2019-01-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2019-06-27 — Sou extension 5 filed
2019-06-29 — Sou extension 5 granted
2019-07-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2020-02-03 — Application abandoned
2020-02-03 — Application abandoned
2020-02-03 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Green Mile Holdings, LLC
Boca Raton , FL
Green Mile Holdings, LLC
Boca Raton , FL
Correspondent
DANIEL S. POLLEY DANIEL S. POLLEY, P.A. 7251 W PALMETTO PARK RD STE 202 BOCA RATON, FL 33433-3487 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-02-08
Status Date:
2020-02-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.