Trademark search for:

L.I.F.T. STRENGTH & CONDITIONING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-05-24 — Application filed
2016-05-27 — Application filed
2016-05-31 — Application filed
2016-06-01 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2016-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
2016-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
2017-04-13 — Application abandoned
2017-04-13 — Application abandoned
2017-04-13 — Final status recorded
2018-02-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-02-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-11-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-11-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-05-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-05-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-05-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-03-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-03-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-03-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2024-05-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2024-05-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2024-05-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received

Owner Information

L.I.F.T. Strength & Conditioning
Lakewood , CO

Correspondent

John Davis Kearney, McWilliams & Davis, PLLC
55 Waugh #150
Houston, TX 77007
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-05-24

Status Date:
2017-04-13

Category:
Education & Entertainment

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.