Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2016 ›
MI ›
MISS HUSTLE FANCY
Trademark search for:
MISS HUSTLE FANCY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-08-08 — Application filed
2016-08-11 — Application filed
2016-08-11 — Application filed
2016-11-17 — Assigned to examiner
2016-11-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-12-14 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-01-03 — Published for opposition
2017-01-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-02-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-08-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-08-21 — Teas statement of use received
2017-08-21 — Use amendment filed
2017-09-08 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-09-19 — Statement of use processing complete
2017-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
2017-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
2017-10-03 — Final disposition recorded
2018-02-05 — Office action issued
2018-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-02-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-10-17 — Application abandoned
2018-10-17 — Final status recorded
2018-10-18 — Application abandoned
2018-11-02 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
Owner Information
Coleman, Pariss
Charlotte , NC
Coleman, Pariss
Charlotte , NC
Correspondent
COLEMAN, PARISS P.O. Box 18634 CHARLOTTE, NC 28218 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-08-08
Status Date:
2018-10-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.