Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Education & Entertainment ›
2019 ›
AN ›
ANGRY BURLY BROS
Trademark search for:
ANGRY BURLY BROS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2019-10-29 — Application filed
2019-11-01 — Application filed
2019-11-01 — Application filed
2019-11-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-11-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-02-03 — Assigned to examiner
2020-02-07 — Examiners amendment -written
2020-02-07 — Suspension letter written
2020-02-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-02-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-02-07 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2020-02-07 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2020-02-07 — Examiner's amendment entered
2020-08-07 — Suspension inquiry written
2020-08-07 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2020-08-07 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2020-10-19 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-10-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-10-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-10-20 — Application abandoned
2020-10-21 — Application abandoned
2020-10-21 — Application abandoned
2020-10-21 — Final status recorded
2022-01-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-01-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-01-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
Matthew Gike & Thomas Gike
Burlington CA
Correspondent
Sherry L. Rollo Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP 200 West Madison Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60606
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2019-10-29
Status Date:
2020-10-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.