Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1969 ›
SA ›
SAGEM
Trademark search for:
SAGEM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-09-22 — Application filed
1998-06-16 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-18 — Assigned to examiner
1998-07-02 — Final disposition recorded
1998-12-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-02-19 — Office action issued
1999-07-01 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1999-07-01 — Assigned to examiner
1999-07-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-01-14 — Notice of publication
2000-02-15 — Published for opposition
2000-05-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2000-11-09 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2001-03-09 — Application abandoned
2001-03-30 — Reinstated
2001-03-30 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2001-05-29 — Registered-principal register
2006-10-18 — Case file in ticrs
2007-05-29 — Paper received
2007-05-29 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2007-06-06 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2007-06-21 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-06-21 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-06-25 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2008-12-04 — Notice of design search code mailed
2011-12-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2011-12-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SAFRAN
PARIS FR
SAGEM SA
75016 PARIS FR
SAGEM SA
75016 PARIS FR
SAGEM SA
75016 PARIS FR
Correspondent
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELAND MAIER & NEUSTADT 1940 DUKE STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-09-22
Status Date:
2011-12-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.