Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1975 ›
RE ›
RESOMICS
Trademark search for:
RESOMICS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1975-03-18 — Application filed
1984-04-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
1998-10-30 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1998-10-30 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1998-10-30 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1998-10-30 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1999-01-06 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-10-05 — Case file in ticrs
2008-11-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2008-11-25 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-12-15 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-12-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2009-01-21 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2009-01-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2009-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-07-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-07-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-12-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
Nagaokakyo-shi, Kyoto JP
Correspondent
Richard LaCava Arent Fox LLP 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42 New York, NY 10019 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1975-03-18
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.