Trademark search for:

MICROVOX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1992-09-02 — Application filed
1992-11-19 — Assigned to examiner
1993-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
1993-04-23 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-05-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
1993-07-23 — Notice of publication
1993-08-24 — Published for opposition
1994-05-03 — Registered-principal register
2000-04-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-06-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2003-07-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-03-17 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-04-28 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
2004-08-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-08-10 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-11-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2011-03-28 — Case file in ticrs
2011-04-07 — Case file in ticrs
2013-05-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-05-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SONOVA HOLDING AG
STAEFA CH

PHONAK HOLDING AG
CH-8712 STAFA CH

Phonak AG
CH-8712 Stafa CH

Phonak AG
CH-8712 Stafa CH

Phonak AG
CH-8712 Stafa CH

Correspondent

Sherri L. Eastley Pirkey Barber PLLC
600 Congress Avenue Suite 2120
Austin, TX 78701
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1992-09-02

Status Date:
2016-02-19

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1976

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.