Trademark search for:

AIR-O-PAD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1980-08-01 — Application filed
1982-06-08 — Published for opposition
1982-09-07 — Registered-principal register
1988-08-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1988-10-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2002-09-05 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2002-09-05 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-12-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-12-13 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2003-05-22 — Paper received
2006-08-24 — Review of correspondence complete
2007-04-30 — Paper received
2007-05-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2007-05-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2007-07-20 — Review of correspondence complete
2008-04-10 — Case file in ticrs
2008-04-14 — Paper received
2008-04-28 — Review of correspondence complete
2016-03-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-03-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE GB

HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE GB

Huntleigh Medical Limited
Luton, Bedfordshire GB

Huntleigh Medical Limited
Luton, Bedfordshire GB

Huntleigh Medical Limited
Luton, Bedfordshire GB

Correspondent

SCOTT A HORTEMEYER THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL
100 GALLERIA PKWY STE 1750
ATLANTA, GA 30339-5948
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1980-08-01

Status Date:
2016-03-18

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1980

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.