Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1982 ›
PA ›
PARTS
Trademark search for:
PARTS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-08-21 — Application filed
2017-08-24 — Application filed
2017-08-25 — Application filed
2017-08-26 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2017-09-05 — Assigned to examiner
2017-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-02-16 — Office action issued
2018-02-28 — Assigned to lie
2018-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-03-21 — Suspension letter written
2018-03-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-03-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-09-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-10-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2018-10-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-10-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2019-04-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2019-04-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2019-04-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-05-20 — Suspension letter written
2019-05-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-05-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-12-17 — Suspension inquiry written
2019-12-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2019-12-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2020-03-10 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-03-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-03-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-03-10 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-06-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2020-06-27 — Assigned to lie
2020-06-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-06-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-07-23 — Suspension letter written
2020-07-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-07-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-02-22 — Suspension inquiry written
2021-02-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2021-02-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2021-08-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2021-08-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2021-08-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2021-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2021-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2021-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2022-04-14 — Teas amendment of use received
2022-04-14 — Office action issued
2022-04-15 — Use amendment filed
2022-04-15 — Amendment to use processing complete
2022-04-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-04-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-05-31 — Use amendment accepted
2022-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2022-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2022-05-31 — Final disposition recorded
2022-06-01 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2022-10-25 — Teas change of owner address received
2022-10-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-10-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-10-25 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2022-10-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-10-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-12-13 — Application abandoned
2022-12-13 — Application abandoned
2022-12-13 — Application abandoned
2022-12-13 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
New Flyer Industries Canada ULC
Winnipeg CA
Correspondent
Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C. 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North West Suite 1025 Washington, DC 20006
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-08-21
Status Date:
2022-12-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.