Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DTAS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2019-04-05 — Application filed
  • 2019-04-09 — Application filed
  • 2019-04-23 — Application filed
  • 2019-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2019-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-09-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-09-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-09-23 — Office action issued
  • 2019-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-10-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2019-10-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-10-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2020-04-08 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2020-04-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2020-04-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2020-07-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2020-09-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2020-10-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2020-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2020-10-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2020-10-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2020-10-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2020-10-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2021-08-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2021-09-21 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-09-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-09-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-09-21 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2021-09-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-09-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-09-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2021-11-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2021-11-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2021-11-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2022-04-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2022-04-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2022-04-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2022-06-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2022-06-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2022-06-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2023-02-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2023-02-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2023-02-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2023-02-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2023-02-22 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2023-02-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2023-02-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2023-05-18 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2024-02-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2024-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-02-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-02-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2024-02-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2024-02-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2025-01-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2025-02-09 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2025-02-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2025-02-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2025-07-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2025-07-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2025-07-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Casebank Technologies Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario CA

Correspondent

Ryan M. Kaiser Ellis Legal
200 West Madison Street
Suite 2670
Chicago, IL 60606

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2019-04-05
Status Date:
2025-07-02
Filing Year:
1984

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.