Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1987 ›
ST ›
STRUCAD
Trademark search for:
STRUCAD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1987-05-12 — Application filed
1987-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
1987-08-03 — Letter of suspension mailed
1988-03-31 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1988-07-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1988-08-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
1988-10-15 — Notice of publication
1988-11-15 — Published for opposition
1989-02-07 — Registered-principal register
1995-02-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1995-10-04 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
1996-02-28 — Response received to post reg. action
1996-03-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2002-11-06 — Paper received
2002-11-06 — Registered - sec. 15 affidavit filed
2003-01-21 — Registered - sec. 15 acknowledged
2008-07-28 — Case file in ticrs
2009-01-28 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2009-01-30 — Assigned to paralegal
2009-02-12 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2009-02-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2010-08-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-02-07 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ACECAD SOFTWARE LIMITED
Derby GB
ACECAD SOFTWARE LIMITED
WHITE WALTHAM GB
ACECAD SOFTWARE LIMITED
WHITE WALTHAM GB
Correspondent
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLC 2300 N St., N.W. Washington, DC 20037 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1987-05-12
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.