Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1989 ›
FU ›
FUTUREPERFECT
Trademark search for:
FUTUREPERFECT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-03 — Application filed
2005-03-10 — Application filed
2005-09-24 — Suspension letter written
2005-09-24 — Assigned to examiner
2005-09-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
2006-03-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-09-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-03-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-07-03 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-07-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-09-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-03-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-09-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-09-26 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-09-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-10-16 — Law office publication review completed
2009-11-04 — Notice of publication
2009-11-24 — Published for opposition
2010-02-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-09-20 — Application abandoned
2010-09-20 — Application abandoned
2010-09-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Atrenta Inc.
San Jose , CA
Atrenta Inc.
San Jose , CA
Correspondent
PATRICIA L. COTTON PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP P.O. BOX 10500 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP MCLEAN, VA 22102
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-03
Status Date:
2010-09-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.