Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1989 ›
PP ›
P PIERBURG
Trademark search for:
P PIERBURG
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1989-02-06 — Application filed
1989-04-17 — Final disposition recorded
1989-09-01 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-09-25 — Examiners amendment mailed
1989-10-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
1989-11-18 — Notice of publication
1989-12-19 — Published for opposition
1989-12-19 — Published for opposition
1990-03-13 — Registered-principal register
1996-03-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1996-07-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2000-03-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2000-03-18 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2000-11-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2000-11-21 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2003-05-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-12-12 — Case file in ticrs
2010-03-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-03-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-09-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-09-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-01-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-01-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PIERBURG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
NEUSS DE
PIERBURG GMBH
D-41456 NEUSS DE
PIERBURG GMBH
NEUSS DE
PIERBURG GMBH
NEUSS DE
Correspondent
Norman B. Thot Patent Law Offices of Dr. Norman B. Thot P.O. Box 10 17 56 Ratingen, 40837 GERMANY
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1989-02-06
Status Date:
2016-01-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.