Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1990 ›
CO ›
CORNELY
Trademark search for:
CORNELY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1990-12-07 — Application filed
1991-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
1991-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
1991-11-25 — Assigned to examiner
1991-11-25 — Assigned to examiner
1991-11-27 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-04-03 — Notice of publication
1992-05-05 — Published for opposition
1992-07-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-01-06 — Use amendment filed
1993-03-01 — Statement of use processing complete
1993-03-02 — Assigned to examiner
1993-03-17 — Final disposition recorded
1993-07-12 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-07-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1993-10-05 — Registered-principal register
1999-01-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1999-08-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2003-06-09 — Paper received
2003-06-09 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2003-08-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2003-08-28 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-09-18 — Case file in ticrs
2014-04-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2014-04-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
KABUSHIKIKAISHA BARUDAN
Aichi-ken JP
KABUSHIKIKAISHA BARUDAN
Aichi-ken JP
KABUSHIKIKAISHA BARUDAN
Aichi-ken JP
Correspondent
GEORGE R PETTIT CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ,LLP 1990 M ST NW STE 800 WASHINGTON, DC 20036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1990-12-07
Status Date:
2014-04-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.