Trademark search for:

SPINDALIGN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1990-01-19 — Application filed
1990-04-06 — Assigned to examiner
1990-04-25 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1990-05-09 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1990-06-04 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1990-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
1990-08-06 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-10-09 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1990-10-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
1990-12-14 — Notice of publication
1991-01-15 — Published for opposition
1991-04-09 — Registered-principal register
1997-04-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1997-05-12 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
1998-01-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2001-01-18 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2001-05-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2001-05-11 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-10-17 — Case file in ticrs
2016-01-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-01-22 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PRUFTECHNIK DIETER BUSCH AG
ISMANING D-85737 DE

Pruftechnik Dieter Busch + Partner GmbH & Co.
Ismaning, Bundesrepublik DE

Pruftechnik Dieter Busch + Partner GmbH & Co.
Ismaning, Bundesrepublik DE

Pruftechnik Dieter Busch + Partner GmbH & Co.
Ismaning, Bundesrepublik DE

Correspondent

CHRISTINE R ETHRIDGE ESQ KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP
HENRY W OLIVER BLDG
535 SMITHFIELD ST
PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1990-01-19

Status Date:
2016-01-22

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1990

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.