Trademark search for:

MADISON FIELDING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1991-03-18 — Application filed
1991-06-20 — Assigned to examiner
1991-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
1991-08-16 — Notice of publication
1991-09-17 — Published for opposition
1991-12-10 — Registered-principal register
1997-12-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1998-01-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2002-06-12 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-08-31 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-08-31 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-02-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-12-07 — Case file in ticrs
2011-11-22 — Paper received
2011-11-22 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2011-12-01 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-12-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2017-03-22 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2020-12-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-06-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-06-24 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NAUGHTON, DIANNE
FAIRFIELD , CT

MADISON FIELDING, INC.
Port Chester , NY

MADISON FIELDING, INC.
Port Chester , NY

MADISON FIELDING, INC.
Port Chester , NY

Correspondent

ARTHUR POWERS MADISON FIELDING INC.
200 WILLIAM STREET
PORT CHESTER, NY 10573
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1991-03-18

Status Date:
2022-06-24

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1991

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.