Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1991 ›
MI ›
MICROPOST
Trademark search for:
MICROPOST
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1991-12-05 — Application filed
1992-02-24 — Assigned to examiner
1992-02-24 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1992-03-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
1992-09-11 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1992-12-18 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-01-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-02-19 — Notice of publication
1993-03-23 — Published for opposition
1993-06-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-12-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
1994-02-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
1994-06-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
1994-07-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
1994-12-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
1995-01-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
1995-06-13 — Sou extension 4 filed
1995-07-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
1995-12-15 — Sou extension 5 filed
1996-01-31 — Sou extension 5 granted
1996-06-15 — Use amendment filed
1996-08-13 — Statement of use processing complete
1996-08-20 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1996-08-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1996-09-03 — Final disposition recorded
1997-02-21 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-04-07 — Office action issued
1998-01-09 — Application abandoned
1998-01-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MICROPOST CORPORATION
Vancouver, British Columbia CA
MICROPOST CORPORATION
Vancouver, British Columbia CA
Correspondent
BRUCE A TASSAN JACKSON & KELLY 2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N W STE 400 WASHINGTON, DC 20037
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1991-12-05
Status Date:
1998-01-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.