Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SYLVAN LEARNING CENTERS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1991-04-09 — Application filed
  • 1991-07-31 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1991-09-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1991-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1992-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1992-04-28 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1992-05-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1992-05-19 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 1992-05-21 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1992-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1992-05-29 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 1992-06-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1992-07-24 — Notice of publication
  • 1992-08-25 — Published for opposition
  • 1992-11-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1993-05-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 1993-07-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 1993-11-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 1994-01-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 1994-05-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 1994-06-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 1994-11-10 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 1994-12-17 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 1995-05-15 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 1995-07-10 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 1995-11-18 — Application abandoned
  • 1995-11-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SYLVAN KEE SYSTEMS
Columbia , MD
SYLVAN KEE SYSTEMS
Columbia , MD

Correspondent

DONALD N HUFF WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON
STE 725
1400 K ST N W
WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1991-04-09
Status Date:
1995-11-18
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
1991

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.