Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1991 ›
SY ›
SYSGEM
Trademark search for:
SYSGEM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-05-05 — Application filed
2000-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
2000-12-05 — Final disposition recorded
2001-05-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-09-28 — Office action issued
2002-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-04-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-07-24 — Notice of publication
2002-08-13 — Published for opposition
2002-08-13 — Published for opposition
2002-11-05 — Registered-principal register
2006-08-21 — Paper received
2006-09-02 — Review of correspondence complete
2007-12-26 — Case file in ticrs
2008-10-15 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2008-10-20 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-10-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-09-17 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2012-09-29 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-09-29 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-09-29 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-09-29 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - mailed
2012-11-02 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-11-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-05-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-05-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sysgem AG
8002 Zurich CH
Sysgem AG
8008 Zurich CH
Sysgem AG
8008 Zurich CH
Correspondent
Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10017-5621 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-05-05
Status Date:
2023-05-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.